How to review your SMSF investment strategy
Super law sets out some requirements that trustees of regulated super funds need to consider when formulating an investment strategy.
These requirements include (but not limited to) the composition of investments, risk and return, liquidity, insurance and the ability to pay liabilities (including member benefits) as they become due.
Looking first at the composition of investments, there isn’t a requirement that SMSF investments must be diversified, and there are some SMSFs that have large investments in a single asset or asset class.
Most commonly this occurs where the SMSF has a direct property investment, with a comparatively smaller investment in cash in order to make relevant payments as necessary.
Whether or not this approach is right is a question for the trustees of each SMSF to determine for themselves, but the old saying of “not putting all your eggs in one basket” is worth considering.
Using this example, what would happen if the property market was to fall? Do you have enough time to ride out fluctuations and get your money back? This points to the next consideration of risk versus return.
With any investment decision, a consideration of the risk involved in a particular investment balanced against the potential returns or reward should probably be undertaken. Of course, these are both forward looking.
History may tell us a little about the risks and returns for particular investments over a period of time, but there are no guarantees about what will happen in the future.
This is why it’s usually important for SMSF trustees to spend some time making an assessment of these important characteristics.
However, it is unlikely that a consideration of risk and return is just limited to the actual investments themselves. Often the best starting place is what the SMSF trustee’s risk and return parameters are.
If the market was to fall by 10 per cent, how long would they be willing to stay invested in the same asset to recover the capital?
This can help determine how much risk the SMSF trustee is willing to take on. And this consideration may not be about a particular investment, but rather the composition of all the assets in the SMSF.
How much to allocate to growth assets (which usually have higher risk) compared to how much to invest in more stable investments (which are generally subject to less volatility).
Risk may only be one side of the equation – return may be equally as important to consider. In fact, given one of the key objectives of super is to grow wealth towards retirement, generating an appropriate level of return is important, and invariably involves taking on some element of risk.
Another requirement may be liquidity and the ability to pay liabilities as and when they fall due.
There is no doubt that you need to be able to pay for the ongoing running costs of your SMSF, but consideration of liquidity takes on heightened importance as members approach retirement.
With super used to fund members’ retirement lifestyles, the need to ensure there is sufficient liquidity is arguably more important, and will involve a consideration of how much should be held in cash (or other liquid investments) and how much should stay invested in less liquid investments to provide for future potential growth in the SMSF.
SMSF trustees are also required to consider the insurance needs of members in formulating the investment strategy.
Given that quite often the trustees of an SMSF are also the members of the SMSF, this is about considering whether you have sufficient insurance of your own, and if not, whether you should acquire more cover through your super.
Depending on the type of investments in your SMSF, you should also consider if you need the fund to take out other types of insurance. This could be an important consideration if you hold property.
So what makes a good SMSF investment strategy? It’s likely one that aligns to the future goals of the members (the trust deed should cover this) and what they are trying to achieve, and ensures this is done with appropriate consideration of the risks in achieving these goals. It should also comply with super legislation and the sole purpose test.
“I have been with Capstone for over three years and have found them refreshing to deal with. They help you become the best version of your business. I can wholeheartedly commend Capstone to any planner.”
Bronson Financial Services
“At a time of industry upheaval, the support of Capstone has been a godsend. Everything they promised they delivered.If you are looking for a new licensee you cannot beat the Capstone service offering."
Canyon Financial Planning
“Capstone Financial Planning should be at the top of your list for a Licensee. Grant and his amazing team give a down to earth and personalised approach to supporting practices.”
“Capstone have some of the highest quality individuals in their team and it’s a pleasure to benefit from their insight and assistance. We really can’t recommend them enough to anyone considering a licensee.”
Strategic Retirement Solutions
“I recommend Capstone to any adviser seeking to 'go out on their own'. They are a fabulous licensee!”
Everalls Wealth Management
“With Capstone I can operate my business free from conflict. They have no in-house products, a flexible APL, and an extensive list of SMA solutions. I recommend Capstone highly.”
“I can highly recommend Capstone for planners seeking an independent licensee that’s not in your face but provide quality support services. Their service and support is second to none and has allowed us to concentrate on providing our clients with a premium level of service.”
“Having been with Capstone for a number of years, one thing that really stands out is their willingness to help and can do attitude. These are qualities we really appreciate.”
“The team at Capstone are all genuinely really good people. They are remarkable with their service culture. They really do care what you think, and they are genuine about our joint success into the longer term.”
Benchmark Financial Planning
“During times of change, it has been reassuring to be with a licensee that regularly engages with advisers and takes feedback seriously.”